“Shameful”: AP criticized for firing journalist in Palestinian ranks News about press freedom


An American journalist led by right-wing groups for her pro-Palestinian activism at the university has condemned her recent dismissal by the news agency The Associated Press, saying she is “a victim of asymmetric enforcement of the rules. on objectivity and social media “.

In a statement shared on Twitter on Saturday, Emily Wilder said her AP managers told her she had violated the news agency’s social media policy when she was fired this week, but that they did not say which tweets violated this policy. , or com.

Her dismissal on Wednesday came after right-wing groups of her student soul, Stanford University, began what Wilder described as a “defamation campaign” against her for her student activism in defense of Palestinian rights.

It also took place during the Israeli period 11-day military offensive in the Gaza Strip, which killed nearly 250 Palestinians and injured more than 1,900 more people. Twelve people also died in Israel from rockets fired from Palestinian coastal territory.

“I am a victim of the asymmetrical application of the rules on objectivity and social media that has censored so many journalists (especially Palestinian journalists and other journalists of color) before me,” Wilder said in his statement.

A Twitter post Monday from Stanford Republicans had criticized Wilder, who is Jewish, as an “anti-Israeli agitator” while on campus.

Afterwards, Washington Free Beacon published an article entitled: “AP hires anti-Israel activist as news collaborator. The AP’s objectivity in question amid revelations shared office space with Hamas. This story was picked up on other forums, including the Fox News website.

Just days before, Israel bombed a building in Gaza which housed the AP office, as well as Al Jazeera offices and several residential flats.

The Israeli government said the al-Jalaa tower “contained military property belonging to the intelligence offices of the terrorist organization Hamas,” a claim that was rejected by media organizations, which demanded an independent investigation.

On Friday, AP spokeswoman Lauren Easton will not say what Wilder, who began working as an AP news associate on May 3 in Phoenix, Arizona, had written that violated the company’s social media policy. reported the news agency.

“We have this policy, so a person’s comments can’t create dangerous conditions for our journalists covering the story,” Easton said.

“All PA journalists are responsible for safeguarding our ability to report on this conflict, or any other, with fairness and credibility, and cannot take sides in public forums.”


But journalists and others have criticized the AP for firing Wilder, saying the measure reflects an unfair double standard on who is considered “biased” when it comes to reporting on Israel-Palestine.

Since Israel launched its attacks on Gaza on May 10, there has been growing criticism of how the media, especially in the US, covers the conflict.

“This is embarrassing and the journalistic organizations that exist to demand accountability and transparency from others must remain at the same standards,” U.S. investigative journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones said on Saturday about the looting. of Wilder.

“This is a rather egregious case of selective application,” said Khaled Elgindy, director of the Palestine and Palestinian-Israeli Affairs Program of the Middle East Institute think tank.

“There is a calculation that reaches American journalism. Well. Time has passed to rethink a notion of “objectivity” and “neutrality” that has always privileged the status quo and all those who benefit from it, “said the former US secretary of state. ‘Housing and Urban Development, Julian Castro he tweeted.

In his statement, Wilder questioned what message his removal sends to other young people who want to pursue journalism.

“I have to wonder what kind of message this sends to young people hoping to channel just outrage or passion for justice into shocking narratives,” he wrote.

“What future does it promise aspiring journalists that an institution like The Associated Press would sacrifice those with less power to the cruel troll of a group of anonymous thugs? What does it mean for this industry to even share the painful experiences of Palestinians or interrogate language that we use to describe them can be seen hopelessly “skewed?”

Source link