President Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador’s coalition will not reach the two-thirds majority needed for major reforms.
Mexicans have voted to curb the power of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador in the election, according to an official forecast of results, which gives his Morena party and its allies a small majority that will make it difficult to carry out substantial reforms.
The National Electoral Institute (INE) on Sunday estimates that the ruling coalition will win between 265 and 292 of the 500 lower house seats, in the absence of the two-thirds majority needed to push for amendments to the constitution.
Lopez Obrador, who has pledged to transform Mexico with a review of politics and the economy, has gambled on constitutional changes to protect state-owned energy companies.
In addition to the vote in the lower house of Congress, Mexicans chose 15 state governors and state lawmakers in Sunday’s race, which is seen as a referendum on Lopez Obrador’s policies and his shaking of Mexico’s institutions.
Opinion polls in recent days showed Morena winning most of the 15 governorship races. The results are expected overnight.
The contest has taken place amid the COVID-19 pandemic and a wave of political violence that has killed more than 90 politicians since the election process began in September.
On Sunday, two leaders and other human remains were left at polling stations in the Mexican border city of Tijuana, authorities said.
An hour after the election began, a man threw his head at a polling station, interrupting voting while police were called, Baja California state prosecutors said.
A couple of hours later, at another polling station in the same area, a man left another head and dismantled human remains inside a wooden box next to the polls.
According to the Baja California Prosecutor’s Office, more human remains were discovered in bags near a third polling station.
Since taking office in 2018 after a defeat, Lopez Obrador has tried to channel more resources to poor and important infrastructure projects and has expanded the state’s role in the energy industry. It has also reduced government costs.
Critics say it has eroded institutional controls and balances.